A digital twin sounds like a shop-floor simulation problem. For most manufacturing procurement and cost teams, the more immediate use case is smaller and more practical: modelling a part's cost and manufacturability before it's built, not after.
What is a digital twin in manufacturing?
A digital twin is a virtual model of a part, process, or production line used to simulate and evaluate outcomes before committing to physical production. In its full industrial form, this means a continuously updated model of an entire production line, synced with live sensor data. In the form most relevant to cost and sourcing teams, it means a part- or process-level model — geometry, material, process route — that can be evaluated for cost and manufacturability before a single physical part exists.
Where digital twins help manufacturing and procurement teams today
- Should-cost modelling — a part's digital model is itself a lightweight digital twin used to predict manufacturing cost before a supplier quote arrives
- Process route simulation — comparing alternative manufacturing processes on the same digital model before committing to one
- Supplier capability matching — evaluating which suppliers' actual process capability matches the digital model's requirements
- What-if cost scenarios — testing the cost impact of a material substitution or tolerance change without cutting any physical material
Where the model still needs structured data, not just simulation
A digital twin is only as useful as the data behind it. A geometric model without accurate material pricing, machine rate data, or supplier capability information will simulate a plausible-looking but ultimately unreliable cost outcome. This is why digital twin initiatives that succeed for cost and sourcing purposes are usually paired with structured should-cost and supplier intelligence data, rather than treated as a standalone simulation exercise.
Digital twins for aerospace and defence programmes
In long-lifecycle, high-certification programmes, the cost of a wrong physical prototype is high — tooling, material, and schedule. A digital twin lets engineering and cost teams evaluate multiple design and process alternatives virtually before committing to a physical build, which is particularly valuable when first-article inspection and AS9100 documentation make every physical iteration expensive.
Key takeaways
- For cost and sourcing teams, the most immediate digital twin use case is part- and process-level cost simulation, not full production-line simulation
- A digital twin is only as reliable as the should-cost and supplier capability data behind it
- What-if scenarios can be tested virtually before any physical material is cut
- Long-lifecycle, high-certification programmes benefit most, since physical iteration is expensive there
Related on Emithran
- Should-Cost Analysis Software
Bottom-up part cost models and negotiation briefs built from your drawings and BOMs.
- BOM Management Software
Validate, enrich and cost multi-level BOMs in one place.
Frequently asked questions
What is a digital twin in manufacturing?
A virtual model of a part, process, or production line used to simulate and evaluate outcomes before committing to physical production — ranging from a full, sensor-synced production-line model to a lighter part- or process-level cost and manufacturability model.
Do I need IoT sensors to use a digital twin?
Not for the cost and sourcing use cases most procurement and engineering teams care about. A part- or process-level digital twin built from CAD, material specs, and process route data can simulate cost and manufacturability without any live sensor data.
How accurate is a digital twin's cost prediction?
It's bounded by the accuracy of the underlying should-cost and process data, not by the simulation itself. A digital twin built on solid material pricing, machine rate, and process route data is as accurate as a well-built should-cost model — typically within ±8–12% for standard processes.
What's the difference between a digital twin and a should-cost model?
A should-cost model estimates cost for a defined part and process route. A digital twin is the broader virtual representation that the should-cost model can be run against — and can also test alternative process routes, materials, or tolerances before deciding which one to cost in detail.
Where do digital twins add the most value in aerospace manufacturing?
Wherever a physical prototype iteration is expensive — which is most of aerospace manufacturing, given tooling cost, material cost, and AS9100-driven documentation requirements for every build.
Abushan is the CTO of Emithran. He built the Should-Cost Engine that powers cost modelling for Emithran's defence, aerospace, and space OEM customers. He has personally run should-cost analyses on everything from injection-moulded plastic covers to 74-line chassis ladder frame assemblies.
CTO · Emithran · LinkedIn · Last updated September 18, 2026
Newsletter
Get the Manufacturing Intelligence Briefing
By clicking "Sign up" you agree to Emithran's Privacy Policy and consent to Emithran using your contact data for newsletter purposes.
